Anger Management In A Volatile Political & Religious Climate

Amid the noise and confusion of our current political and religious climate, it’s easy for people to get overwhelmed and let the carnal side of them take a little victory lap. That’s what the system likes—emotion without discipline, heat without purpose. John Lennon’s advice about peaceful protest fits that target; it’s just not a methodology I was trained in from the beginning.

Life has taught me blunt lessons. First: if something needs doing—especially if nobody’s lining up to do it for you—and you’re “qualified” or “not qualified,” then it’s on you. That was my conditioning in a hardworking environment: society may call you useful or weak depending on whether you step forward. So I’ve become a man of many talents and a master of practicality—because “waiting for the perfect credentials” is how people end up staying stuck.

Second: if I let rage show too early, most folks either dismiss me or try to control me. If I keep it contained until it’s earned, people take me seriously—or they should. The result is simple. Either they listen, they respect the reasons and expectations, and they comply, or they end up dealing with a man who isn’t pleasant to argue with, isn’t easy to manipulate, and doesn’t confuse politeness with compliance. I’m not the “nice” guy on the block. I’m the tired one—watching unethical behavior rewarded and laziness excused—and I’m done pretending that’s fine.

In my mind, built by Scandinavian stoicism and a military work ethic inherited through family stories, expectations are high. When someone gives me their word, I intend to collect on it—because no excuses are acceptable when promises are made. I’m a harsh critic when it comes to follow-through. Not because I’m looking for conflict, but because I’ve learned what happens when promises are treated like decorations. Trauma from bullies has never been a polite lesson; it’s a training program. And right now, I can see it growing—on the state, national, and world stages—like the worst kind of weather.

Questions Worth Asking

What does one hope to accomplish with rage? Channeled correctly—and tempered with wisdom—it becomes a community healer. Most people don’t want to deal with an ill-tempered person; even scripture talks about temper and restraint for a reason. If you want a place to study it, start where you’ll find discipline under pressure. If you want a word for the “berserker” side of it, go look into the sagas—Norse, Finnish, Germanic, Swedish—where endurance and fury are woven together. This isn’t posturing. It’s part of the ancestral language in my blood.

Here’s the practical message beneath the rambling: emotions aren’t toxic by themselves. The toxic part is what people do when they let emotion steer without steering discipline. For me, the negative energy gets filtered into community work. My best output is the written word. Personal appearances and constant conversations drain me fast, and small talk bores me to death. I talk when there’s something to learn—what others value, what others dismiss, and what might actually matter to the people living the consequences.

So now you know why I’m a one chance and done kind of minister. Make it clear you want me as a disposable tool—the guy who does the tasks so you can keep your hands clean—and you’ll find out what you’re really buying. If I do the work while you claim you did it, don’t act surprised when I don’t play along. Call it callous if you want. I call it accountability. I’m not your candy-coated comfort blanket. If you want sugar, go buy it in a shop where it belongs.

I don’t play games with expectations, and I’m not here to be anyone’s soft version of agreement. Yes, some will say I used to be lazy—that might be true. Some will say I’m not “team-friendly”—also true, depending on what kind of team they mean. Others will say I’m the hardest worker they can hire for the money they’re willing to pay. That’s true too. What you get from me depends entirely on your approach. I don’t offer mystery; I offer standards.

My motives are clear. My approach is still being refined. My outlook is cautiously optimistic—with the option of reacting to injustice when it’s earned. I’m done playing games with a world that refuses to live by ethical rules.

One might wonder where the perceived hostility comes from. I’ve seen crooked politics put on a clean apron while insisting that I be the ethical one. That demand gets met with measured rage—because if you expect ethics, you’d better practice it too. The rules aren’t optional, and I don’t accept double standards as “just how things are.” I’d like to believe everyone would play by the same code; experience says many won’t, while still asking you to behave as if they will.

I’ve been labeled “hostile” by former employers for holding that line—and also “not a team player” for it. The difference is simple: if you abandon ethical behavior around me, you’ll quickly learn why standards matter. If you embrace ethical behavior, you’ll find I can be the most loyal, steady, hardworking person on the team—because I’ll match the expectations you actually enforce, not the ones you only recite.

My approach may stress a team if everyone wants to skate. That’s a liability, and I won’t pretend otherwise. It’s also a strength refined over time: I know what it takes to keep the corporate machine running when the lights are off, when the parts are worn, and when the work no one brags about still has to get done. That’s the unglamorous basement work—consistent, accountable, and done the way it’s supposed to be done.

Questions Worth Asking

Why were many in the Gen Y and Gen Z groups taught a work ethic that—again, in my view—doesn’t fully match what worked in the formative 1980s and 1990s?

Technological advancement encouraged a shift from “work to the finish” toward “work smarter.” That can be legitimate. Why hammer the same problems by hand when you can automate, optimize, and program a machine to do what used to take notebooks—or backbreaking labor? It makes sense.

Where I take issue is the pinch moment. What happens when the machine breaks and there isn’t time to call a fix? Previous generations would grab the toolbox, solve the problem, and work two to three times harder until the task caught up—because the job still had to be completed, even when convenience failed. In my world, that mattered. As many of my generation used to quip: elementary, my dear Watson.

At the end of the day, each generational style has tradeoffs. Some bring patience and polish, some bring speed and flexibility, and some bring resilience built in the “repair it now” school of hard knocks. The benefit is real in all of them. The liability is also real if you let the tools replace the responsibility.

My goal isn’t to mock any generation—it’s to insist on accountability as the common standard. If you want results, bring ethics, bring follow-through, and bring the willingness to fix what breaks. That’s how the team survives. That’s how the work gets done.

Previous Page

Next Page